Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Sheela Devi – Appellant
Versus
Heera Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sudeepti Sharma, J.
CM-INCOMP-956-2024
This application has been filed under Rule 2 Volume V Chapter 1-C of Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders read with Order 22 Rule 2, Order 1 Rule 10 and Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code for deleting the name of Smt. Shayamo widow of Parbha, performa respondent No.5 from the array of respondents who died during the pendency of the present appeal.
For valid and good reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and name of Smt. Shayamo widow of Parbha, performa respondent No.5 is ordered to be deleted from the array of respondents.
Registry is directed to do the needful.
MAIN CASE
1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 01.09.2006 passed in the claim petition bearing No. 62 of 13.05.2006 filed by the appellants/claimants under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sonepat (for short, 'the Tribunal') for enhancement of compensation granted to the appellants/claimants to the tune of Rs. 3,62,064/- on account of death of Kehar Singh in a motor vehicular accident, which occurred on 26.07.2005.
2. As sole issue for determination in the present a
The judgment clarifies compensation adjustments due to insufficient assessment of income and deductions under motor vehicle accident claims.
Compensation for motor vehicle accidents must consider full taxable income, including allowances and future prospects, with appropriate deductions for living expenses based on dependents.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
