PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
JASGURPREET SINGH PURI
Pawan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Yomi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Jasgurpreet Singh Puri, J. (Oral)
The present revision petition has been filed for setting aside the impugned order dated 21.12.2024 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Narnaul, vide which interim maintenance has been granted to the tune of Rs.8,000/- per month to respondent No.2-wife and to the tune of Rs.7,000/- per month to respondent No.l-minor son, who is of the age of 5 years.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that it is a case where earlier an order was passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Narnaul dated 17.08.2023 whereby interim maintenance of the same amount as aforesaid was granted to the respondents but the same was assailed by filing a revision petition before this Court, which was set aside on the ground that affidavits declaring the assets and liabilities of the parties in terms of the judgment passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rajnesh versus Neha and another, (2021) 2 SCC 324 were not filed and therefore, the aforesaid order was set aside with a direction to pass a fresh order after getting the affidavits in terms of judgment passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rajnesh's case (Supra). He furt
Interim maintenance must reflect the child's needs and not be undermined by the parent's personal liabilities; both parents contribute to the child's welfare.
Interim maintenance under Section 125 must balance the wife's needs with the husband's financial obligations, considering both parties' incomes.
Interim maintenance is provisional and based on estimations, requiring financial disclosures to ensure fair assessment and prevent misrepresentation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.