Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MANDEEP PANNU
Vikas – Appellant
Versus
Jai Bhagwan Mittal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bona fide requirement for eviction. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. tenants' objections and counterclaims. (Para 4) |
| 3. analysis of bona fide requirement and building condition. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 16) |
| 4. challenging landlord's bona fide claim. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. court affirms landlord's bona fide requirement. (Para 27 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 6. final dismissal of tenant's appeal. (Para 33 , 34) |
JUDGMENT :
MANDEEP PANNU J.
1. The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioner-tenant challenging the concurrent findings recorded by the learned Rent Controller, Jind vide order dated 31.05.2023 and by the learned Appellate Authority, Jind, vide order dated 23.09.2025, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner–tenant was dismissed and the order of eviction passed by the Rent Controller was upheld.
Brief Facts
2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the respondent in the present revision petition (petitioner–landlord before the Rent Controller) filed a petition under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973 seeking eviction of the tenants from a shop situated opposite Old Bus Stand, near Manju Hotel, Jind. Ac
The landlord’s bona fide requirement for property within the Haryana Rent Act is validated when supported by substantial evidence about dilapidated conditions and genuine business intentions.
The judgment established the importance of genuine and bona fide necessity for eviction under Section 13 of the Act, emphasizing the landlord's right to occupation and the limitation on court interfe....
The bona fide requirement for landlord's premises must be substantiated with evidence, and landlords retain the right to determine their needs for personal or business use.
The requirement of the landlord for eviction must be judged based on the circumstances at the time of filing the petition, and subsequent events do not affect the bonafide need established by the lan....
The landlord's genuine need for tenanted premises, the tenant's burden to provide specific and supported averments, and the landlord's authority to prioritize family needs over tenant's hardship.
Landlord's bona fide need for property doesn’t require dire necessity; tenant's livelihood claims must prove attempts for alternative accommodations.
Bona fide requirement of land lord - Landlord is the best Judge of his requirement and Courts have no concern to dictate to the landlord as to how and in what manner he should live.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
