Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARKESH MANUJA
Billu – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. compensation assessment principles (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments on compensation enhancement (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's reasoning on acquisition value (Para 9 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. conclusion and procedural directives (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT :
HARKESH MANUJA, J.
Vide this common order, a bunch of 07 Regular First Appeals, details of which are given in the footnote of this judgment, are being decided as all the appeals have arisen out of common acquisition/Award involving common facts and question of law. For the sake of brevity, facts are being taken from RFA No.105-2017.
2. By way of filing the present appeal(s) challenge has been laid to the decision dated 31.05.2016 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Bhiwani-cum-Reference Court, seeking further enhancement of compensation.
3. Briefly stating, total 18K-11M of land situated within the revenue estate of Village Mitathal, Tehsil and District Bhiwani was sought to be acquired by the Government of Haryana vide notifications dated 04.12.2012 and 19.03.2013, issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the LAND ACQUISITION ACT , 1894, for short ‘the Act’ respectively, for public purpose i.e. for construction of Mitathal
Compensation for acquired land must be determined based on comparable market values and the advantages associated with location, without undue deductions for development costs.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
