IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ANOOP CHITKARA
Gurmeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
|---|---|---|---|
| 143 | 25.07.2018 | Ajnala, District Amritsar, Punjab | 326/148/149 IPC |
1. The petitioner, incarcerated in the offence captioned above, had come up before this court seeking regular bail by filing the present petition on 09th April 2025.
2. When the matter was taken up for the first time on the 9th of May 2025, the High Court Bar was abstaining, and the case was not taken up. After that, the matter was adjourned because the State had not filed the reply and subsequently adjourned to the present date, i.e., 05th August 2025. Today, the State has also filed a custody certificate dated 04th August 2025, which points out that the petitioner’s custody in this FIR is 5 months and 29 days, i.e., as on today, pre-trial custody is of six months.
3. However, the petitioner’s Counsel informed this Court that during the pendency of the petition, the petitioner’s custody in the trial court exceeded the statutory period and consequently, vide order dated 16-07-2025, the trial court had released the petitioner on bail granting benefits under Section 167 (2) CrPC, which corresponds to Section 187 (3) BNSS . The petitioner’s Counsel also handed over
Mantoo Majumdar v. State of Bihar
Sanjay Dutt v State through CBI Bombay
Suresh Kumar Bhikamchand Jain v. State of Maharashtra and another
The court affirmed that both Magistrates and Sessions Courts possess the authority to grant default bail, even in the pendency of regular bail petitions.
Point of law : The right to be released on default bail continues to remain enforceable if the accused has applied for such bail, notwithstanding pendency of the bail application; or subsequent filin....
The right to default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. is extinguished upon the filing of a charge sheet if the accused has not furnished the required sureties within the stipulated time.
(1) Inordinate delay in placing order of sanction before Special Court cannot be a ground to pray for statutory/default bail under provisions of Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C.(2) Default bail – Right to b....
The right to seek default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. is a fundamental right and not merely a statutory right, which flows from Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The duty of the concerne....
Point of Law : Applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the cour....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.