Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUMEET GOEL
Tinku Alias Rahul – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual basis of the petition and fir details. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by both counsel. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observations on trial and bail conditions. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. grant of bail and conditions imposed. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. final order and closing remarks. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT :
SUMEET GOEL, J.
1. Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘ BNSS ’) for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.377 dated 22.04.2024, registered under Sections 148 , 149, 323, 324, 302, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘ IPC ’), at Police Station City Yamuna Nagar, District Yamuna Nagar.
2. The case set up in the FIR in question (as set out in the present petition by the petitioner) is as follows:
“Statement of Akash son of Shri Aman Kumar, resident of 1001, Balaji Nagar, Dera Bassi, Police Station Derabassi, District Mohali Punjab age 24 years Mobile No.9781842073. It is stated that I am resident of the above mentioned name and address and I work as a Recovery Agent in AK Associates Company, Zirakpur and my maternal uncle's son Abhishek @ Rishu son of Manoj Kumar, resident of Han
Bail can be granted if the petitioner is a young first-time offender without evidence of flight risk or witness tampering, despite serious allegations against him.
The court emphasized the diminishing need for pre-trial detention when prosecution evidence nears completion, recognizing the accused's right to prepare a defense.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
