Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUMEET GOEL
Suhail – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed for anticipatory bail citing fraudulent activity. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel arguments regarding lack of direct allegations and seriousness of charges. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's need for custodial interrogation based on gravity of offence. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's decision against granting bail based on merits. (Para 8) |
| 5. final conclusion addressing case disposition and pending applications. (Para 9 , 10) |
JUDGMENT :
SUMEET GOEL, J.
1. Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the BNS S ’) for grant of pre-arrest/anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.19 dated 16.09.2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318 (4) of , at Police Station Cyber Police Station, Narnaul.
2. The gravamen of the FIR in question reflects that the complainant namely Udai Singh, son of Shri Tulsi Ram and resident of Plot No. 477, HUDA, Sector-1, Narnaul, filed a written complaint concerning fraudulent withdrawals from his joint account (No.0360009900000377) maintained with his wife, Smt. Sumitra Yadav, at Punjab National Bank, Branch New Mandi, Narnaul. He al
Anticipatory bail is denied in cases of serious allegations involving cyber financial fraud, emphasizing the necessity for custodial interrogation to ensure thorough investigation and address broader....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
