SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 1747

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUNITA AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
VIKRANT SAKLANI AND ORS – Respondent


JUDGMENT

YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR. J.(Oral)

1. The aforesaid three appeals have been instituted against the Award dated 04.01.2020 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chandigarh (for short “Tribunal”) in the petitions under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, filed by the appellants seeking enhancement of compensation on account of deaths of Piyush, Ranjana Kapoor and Harshita in a motor vehicular accident due to the rash and negligent driving on the part of respondent No.1-Vikrant Saklani, while driving the offending Volvo Bus No.HR38-Y-0099 (hereinafter referred to as offending vehicle), owned by respondent No.2 and insured with respondent No.3-Insurance Company.

2. Claim petition No.64 of 2019 in FAO-2104-2021, titled ‘Sunita and another Versus Vikrant Saklani and others’, was instituted by the parents of deceased-Piyush, aged 5 years, for grant of compensation on account of death of their son.

3. Claim petition No.70 of 2019 in FAO-2654-2021, titled ‘Rajesh Kapoor Versus Vikrant Saklani And others’, was instituted by the father of deceased-Ranjana Kapoor, aged 18 years, for grant of compensation on account of death of his daughter.

4. Claim petition No.60 of 2019 in FAO-3296-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top