Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIKAS BAHL
Tek Ram @ Teka (Deceased) through his LRs. – Appellant
Versus
Gram Panachayat, Mirchpur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural history and nature of the appellate challenge. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. summary of rival contentions regarding title and section 7 of the 1961 act. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. interpretation of section 7 (summary inquiry) and section 13 (jurisdictional bar). (Para 8 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. appreciation of oral and documentary evidence regarding possession and title. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. final adjudication and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 25 , 26) |
JUDGMENT :
VIKAS BAHL, J.
CHALLENGE IN THE PRESENT APPEAL
1. The plaintiff (now being represented by his legal representative(s)) is in Regular Second Appeal which has been filed under Section 41 of the Punjab Courts Act, 1918. Challenge in the present appeal is to the judgment and decree dated 03.06.1993 passed by the 1st Appellate Court vide which the appeal filed by the respondent-gram panchayat/defendants, was allowed and the suit of the plaintiff/present appellant was dismissed and the judgment of the trial Court dated 17.03.1990 was set aside.
2. It would be relevant to note that earlier vide order dated 17.11.1993 the appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed by the Co-
Under the relevant statute, a revenue authority is not required to stay summary eviction proceedings upon a mere assertion of title. A stay is only mandatory if the claimant provides prima facie docu....
The court emphasized that mere claims of ownership are insufficient; prima facie evidence of title must be established to invoke eviction proceedings under the Punjab Village Common Lands Act.
The court established that the Gram Panchayat has the right to claim ownership of land classified as 'Shamilat Deh' under the Punjab Village Common Lands Act, and private claims must be substantiated....
The court emphasized the importance of providing prima facie evidence to support claims of lease or adverse possession in land dispute cases.
The court affirmed that land classified as 'Banjar Qadim' does not vest in the Gram Panchayat unless proven otherwise, and the presumption of truth in revenue records was upheld, leading to the dismi....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Section 4(3)(ii) of the Punjab Village Common Lands Act, 1961 in determining the possession and rights of ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
