SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(P&H) 1871

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GOURAV @ GOURAV MOUDGIL – Appellant
Versus
RAJ KUMAR AND ORS – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J.

1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 06.09.2011 passed in the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short ‘1988 Act’), by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ambala (in short ‘the Tribunal’) for enhancement of compensation, granted to the appellant/claimant to the tune of Rs.67,564/- along with interest @ 9 % per annum on account of injuries sustained by the appellant/claimant –Gourav in a Motor Vehicular Accident, occurred on 08.03.2009.

2. As sole issue for determination in the present appeal is confined to quantum of compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal, a detailed narration of the facts of the case is not required to be reproduced and is skipped herein for the sake of brevity.

SUBMISSIONS OF THE LEARNED COUNSELS FOR THE PARTIES

3. The learned counsel for the appellant/claimant contends that the compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal is on the lower side and deserves to be enhanced. He further contends that learned Tribunal has erred in not assessing loss of income as the claimant/appellant has suffered disability at the extent of 30%. Therefore, he prays that the pre


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top