Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NIDHI GUPTA
Ishwar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Panchayati Akhara Nirmala Khankal Haridwar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
NIDHI GUPTA, J.
CM-11049-C-2023
Prayer in this application filed under Section 151 CPC is for condonation of delay of 29 days in refiling the accompanying appeal.
2. Heard.
3. For the reasons mentioned in the application which is duly supported by an affidavit of learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, the same is allowed and delay of 29 days in refiling the appeal is condoned.
CM-11050-C-2023
Prayer in this application filed under Order 1, Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 is for deleting the name of respondent no.4 (Defendant No.2 in the original Civil Suit) from the memorandum of parties of the captioned appeal.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant/appellant submits that no prejudice shall be caused to the respondents by deleting the name of respondent No.4 from the array of the memo of parties as the balance of convenience lies in favour of the applicant/appellant.
3. Heard.
4. For the reasons mentioned in the application which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant/appellant, the same is allowed and respondent No.4 is deleted from the memorandum of parties. Registry is directed to make necessary correction in the memo of parties.
RSA-3094-2023 (O
Mere entries in revenue records do not confer title; to maintain a suit for declaration, a party must also seek possession.
In a suit for declaration of title, the burden lies on the plaintiff to establish their title, and failure to do so results in dismissal, regardless of the defendants' claims.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
