Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
BIMLA DEVI AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
SATYA PARKASH AND ORS. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR. J.
IOIN-1-FAO-1687-2005 & IOIN-1-FAO-5452-2004
Respondents No.1 and 2 could not be served. However, the insurance company has been held liable to pay the compensation to the claimants jointly and severally with respondents No.1 and 2. No liability has been fastened upon respondents No.4 and 5 and there is thus no necessity to issue notice to respondents No.1, 2, 4 and 5 as the only issue required for determination is enhancement of compensation, if any.
IOIN stands disposed of.
FAO-1687-2005, FAO-5451-2004 and FAO-5452-2004
1. The aforesaid three appeals have been instituted against the award dated 20.10.2004 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hisar, arising out of the same accident, which was registered vide FIR No.102 dated 18.09.1999 under Sections 279, 337 and 304-A of the IPC at Police Station Kolayat, Bikaner.
2. Claim petition No.342-MACT-2000 was instituted by Bimla Devi and others against Satya Parkash and others for grant of compensation on account of death of Mahender Singh, which occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the drivers of offending bus No.RRF-579 as well as jeep No.HR-39-5300. Offending bus No.RRF-579 is owned by r
Compensation awarded for death in a motor vehicle accident is justified based on established negligence, despite insufficient documentary proof of earnings, applying minimum wage standards.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
