SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(P&H) 2171

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NIDHI GUPTA
Krishna Devi – Appellant
Versus
Maha Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Rajiv Kataria

JUDGMENT :

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

1. Present Second Appeal has been filed by the plaintiffs against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the learned Courts below; whereby suit filed by the appellants for declaration and permanent injunction, has been decreed in part by both the District Courts.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiffs had filed a Civil Suit seeking declaration and annulment of Sale Deed No. 66 dated 13.04.2011 executed by defendant No.1 in favour of defendant No.2 and further seeking injunction restraining defendant No.2 from making any interference in the possession of the plaintiffs over the suit land which was in the possession of the plaintiffs; and further for restraining defendant No.2 from getting the mutation sanctioned on the basis of illegal Sale Deed No. 66 dated 13.04.2011.

3. It was the pleaded case of the appellants in the plaint that defendant No.1 was owner in possession to the extent of 541/10365 share in total land measuring 69K 2M i.e. total land measuring 3K 12M. Defendant No.1 had sold land measuring 1K 10M to plaintiff No.1 by virtue of Sale Deed No. 115 dated 22.04.2010; and remaining land measuring 2K 5M was sold by defendant No.1 to plain

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top