IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JAGDISH CHANDER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J.
RA-CW-59-2026
The applicant-petitioner through instant application is seeking review of order dated 11.11.2025 and to restore the main petition to its original number and stage.
For the reasons set out in the application, the same is allowed. The main case is restored to its original number and stage.
With the consent of both sides, the main case is taken on Board.
Main case
1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of orders whereby he was dismissed from service.
2. The petitioner was holding rank of Assistant Sub-Inspector at the time of passing impugned order dated 28.07.2003. A team of police officers was deputed to produce two hardcore criminals before the Trial Court. Two unidentified boys attacked the undertrial prisoners. One undertrial prisoner died and another sustained injury. The respondent conducted a departmental inquiry alleging cowardness and negligence on the part of petitioner and his colleagues which led to aforesaid incident. They were found guilty of the alleged offence. The Disciplinary Authority dismissed him from service. The petitioner unsuccessfully preferr
The court affirmed that its jurisdiction in disciplinary matters is limited, focusing on procedural adherence and not reappraising evidence unless the punishment is grossly disproportionate.
The High Court's review in disciplinary matters is constrained to procedural correctness and does not extend to re-evaluating evidence or punishment unless grossly disproportionate.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.