Seema Begum vs State of Haryana - 2025 Supreme(P&H) 1886

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(P&H) 1886

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
Seema Begum – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Pratap Singh, Advocate, Mr. Manav Sharma, Advocate
Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, DAG, Haryana.
For the Respondent:Mr. Jitender Sharma, Advocate,Ms. Manvi Arora, Advocate, for Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J.

CRM-47692-2025

This is an application for impleading the applicants as respondents in the present case, who are the victims in the present case.

Application is allowed, as prayed for.

Main Case

1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.254 dated 04.07.2025 registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC, at Police Station Nissing, District Karnal.

2. Brief facts as per the prosecution case are that the petitioner along with other co-accused under the name of Pride Nidhi Limited Bank duped the complainant and others for a sum of Rs.1.40 crores on the pretext of doubling their money in 26 months. Hence, the present FIR.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He argued that earlier also, the complainant had filed the similar complaint against the petitioner and others and after investigation of the matter, the same was found to be false. Thereafter, the present FIR was registered because of political pressure. He further argued that Pride Nidhi Limited Bank (PNL) is