Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ROSHANI AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
SIKENDER SINGH AND OTHERS – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUDEEPTI SHARMA J .
1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 06.02.2025 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhiwani in the claim petition filed under Section 166 and 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, 'the Tribunal’) for enhancement of compensation granted to the claimants to the tune of Rs.14,30,800/- along with interest @ 7% per annum, on account of death of Pawan in a Motor Vehicular Accident, occurred on 03.02.2019.
2. As sole issue for determination in the present appeal is confined to quantum of compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal, a detailed narration of the facts of the case is not required to be reproduced here for the sake of brevity.
SUBMISSIONS OF LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES
3. The learned counsel for the claimants-appellants contends that the amount assessed by the learned Tribunal is on the lower side and deserves to be enhanced. Therefore, he prays that the present appeal be allowed and amount of compensation be enhanced as per latest law.
4. Per contra, learned counsel for respondent No.3-Insurance Company, however, vehemently argues that the award has rightly been passed and the amount of com
In motor accident claims involving students, income assessment must be based on educational qualifications and potential future earnings rather than arbitrary guess-work. Compensation must be calcula....
In motor accident claims, where documentary evidence of income is absent, courts may use minimum wage notifications as a baseline while applying reasonable guesswork to determine actual income. Compe....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
