SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 1988

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARSH BUNGER
Sukhbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Shiv Kumar
For the Respondent: Upasana Dhawan

JUDGMENT :

HARSH BUNGER, J.

1 Petition herein is, inter alia, seeking a writ in the nature of Certiorari, for setting aside the order dated 24.01.2019 (Annexure P-4) passed by learned Assistant Collector 2nd Grade, order dated 14.01.2021 (Annexure P-9) and Sanad Takseem dated 21.01.2021 (Annexure P-10) passed/issued by learned Assistant Collector 1st Grade, Dayalpur.

1.1 A further prayer has been made for setting aside the order dated 10.02.2023 (Annexure P-12) passed by learned Collector Ballabgarh and order dated 03.09.2025 (Annexure P-14) passed by learned Commissioner, Faridabad Division, Faridabad.

2. Briefly, case of the petitioners is that, their father namely Ricchpal Singh had purchased 5½ marla plot from Smt. Mohinder Kaur, out of joint land measuring 01 kanal - 02 marla, comprised in khewat No.264, rectangle No.54, killa No.11/3 (as per jamabandi for the year 1997-98). It is noticeable that as per the copy of sale deed (Annexure P-1A) attached by the petitioner, it is revealed that Ricchpal had purchased only 3½ marla area and not 5½ marlas (as claimed by the petitioners).

3. Be that as it may, respondents No.5 and 6 herein, sought partition of joint land comprised in khewat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top