A.M.BHATTACHARJEE
BISHNU PRASAD SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
KHARGA SINGH RAI – Respondent
( 1 ) THE learned Judicial Magistrate, on receipt of the complaint on transfer from the District Magistrate on 20. 11. 1979 thought it fit to postpone issue of process and to inquire into the case himself under section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and, after taking about 16 months to make such inquiry, ultimately dismissed the complaint on 25. 3. 1981 under section 203 of the Code, finding no sufficient materials to proceed further. On an application filed by the complainant praying for revival of the case, the learned Magistrate registered the same as a separate Misc. Case on 23-7-1981, issued notice on the accused-opposite party and on the appearance of the later handed over a copy of the application to him for filing objection. If any and on receipt of his written reply on 18. 3. 1982, heard the parties on 26. 4. 1982 and finding that the 0. p. has no objection to the application, ordered that the dismissed case stands accordingly revived and the dismissed case, therefore, stood revived about 13 months after the same was dismissed. And then, after proceeding with the revived complaint for about 7 months, the learned Magistrate found that this cas
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.