SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Sikk) 2

RIPUSUDAN DAYAL
ITC LTD. – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNA MOKTAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.CHINGRA, A.K.UPADHYAYA, J.K.MITRA, SHANKAR GOPAL PAGIRE


R. DAYAL, J.

( 1 ) BY this revision petition, the petitioner, I. T. C. Limited, a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, has challenged the order dated 1-5-1991 of shri T. Dorjee, the learned District Judge, Sikkim, rejecting the petitioner's application in Civil Suit No. 1 of 1991, under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for rejecting the plaint on the grounds that the plaint does not disclose any cause of action and the suit is barred by law.

( 2 ) CIVIL Suit No. 1 of 1991 was filed by respondent Nos. 1 to 3 on 21-1-1991. Respondent No. 4 Druk Industrial Company Pvt. Ltd. , is the first defendant and the petitioner company (hereinafter referred as ITC) is the second defendant in the suit. The plaintiffs have claimed the following substantive reliefs :-" (A) a decree of declaration be passed in favour of the plaintiffs and against the Defendants declaring that the Defendants are not entitled to use the aforesaid Foreign Brand name and/or endorsement of "w. D. and H. O. Wills and/or "wills" on the cigarettes packets and cartons manufactured sold and advertised by the Defendant No. 2 through Defendant No. 1 and/or their other Dealers, Agents etc. (B)




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top