S.P.WANGDI
MINTU SINGHA ROY – Appellant
Versus
TENZING DOLKAR – Respondent
S P Wangdi J
[1] This Criminal Misc. Case arises out of General Register Case No. 94 of 2008, under Section 409/420 of the Indian Penal Code ('IPC for short), arising out of Gangtok Sadar Police Station Case No. 65(5)07 dated 11th May, 2007, pending before the Court of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, East Sikkim at Gangtok, wherein the petitioner has been required to appear and answer on the charges as herein stated.
[2] Mr. Subrata Kumar Roy Karmakar, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that a bare reading of the First Information Report read with the Charge-Sheet filed by the police, do not disclose any offence under Section 409 and Section 420, IPC, and, therefore, the proceedings pending before the Learned Judicial Magistrate requires to be quashed. In support of his submission, a large number of decisions have been cited, amongst which is the decision in the case of R. Kalyani v. Janak C. Mehta and others, 2009 1 SCC 516 where the principle of law under Section 482, Cr.P.C. 1973 as enunciated in the case of State of Haryana and others v. Bhajan Lai and others, 1992 Supp1 SCC 335 has been re-emphasised. He further submits that from the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.