MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN
Somnath Sharma S/o Indralall Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Sikkim – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J.
1. The process of justice dispensation in a criminal case mandates a thorough and sincere investigation by the investigating agency to place the absolute truth-the inflexible reality before the Court. The Investigating Officer is required to be professional, ethical, unbiased and adept with the laws. The trial of criminal cases must have the paramount objective to establish the truth. The object of investigation would be to bring home the offence to the offender however, without out stepping from the path of truth. The sole objective of the trial would be to render justice, however harsh the outcome may be. The ultimate object of both investigation and trial is to arrive at the truth. The prosecution as well as the defence lawyers must play a crucial role in the adversarial proceeding. During trial the trial Judge has a fundamental duty to ensure fair play and the acceptance of oral as well as documentary evidence in the manner prescribed by law is fundamental. The understanding of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the procedural law as provided in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) and the ingredients of the offence as defined in the subst
Ashish Batham vs. State of M.P. (2002) 7 SCC 317
Anter Singh vs. State of Rajasthan
Aslam Parwez vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Charandas Swami vs. State of Gujarat
Datar Singh vs. State of Punjab
Hanumant vs. State of M.P. AIR 1952 SC 343 : 1952 SCR 1091 : 1953 CrLJ 129
Jose alias Pappachan vs. Sub-Inspector of Police, Koyilandy
Kishore Chand vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
K.I. Pavunny vs. Assistant Collector (HQ), Central Excise Collectorate, Cochin
Mohd. Inayatullah vs. State of Maharashtra
N. Somashekar (Dead) by LRs. vs. State of Karnataka
Rambraksh vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Raj Kumar Singh vs. State of Rajasthan
Ramgopal vs. State of Maharashtra
Salim Akhtar vs. State of U.P. (2003) 5 SCC 499
State of Karnataka vs. Suvarnamma
State (NCT of Delhi) vs. Navjot Sandhu
State of T.N. vs. Kutty alias Lakshmi Narasimhan
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs. State of Maharashtra
Tufail (Alias) Simmi vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Udai Bhan vs. State of U.P. 1962 Supp (2) SCR 830 : AIR 1962 SC 1116 : (1962) 2 CrLJ 251
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.