BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN
Subash Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Yadap Nepal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J.
1. A Title Suit for declaration, possession, injunction and consequential reliefs was filed by the petitioner herein, as the plaintiff, in the year 2012 claiming his right to tenancy in the four storeyed RCC building situated at Pakyong-Rorathang road, Pakyong, East Sikkim owned by late Dilli Ram Nepal and presently by his son the sole respondent, Yadap Nepal as the defendant.
Case of the plaintiff/petitioner
2. The case of the petitioner is based on the allegation that the respondent would use his influence with the local police to threaten the petitioner out of the building tenanted. The situation compelled the petitioner to sign on a document/agreement prepared by the respondent. Subsequently, on 25.11.2005 the petitioner lodge a First Information Report (FIR) against the respondent, the officer-in-charge of the Pakyong P.S and others with the Superintendent of Police who took prompt initiative and directed investigation by the SDPO, which is pending. The respondent’s ill intention of evicting the petitioner by any means led to various illegal acts of the respondent. The respondent, without notice transferred the electric connection of the building
Abdul Rehman & Anr. v. Mohd. Ruldu & Ors.
Ajendraprasadji N. Pandey v. Swami Keshavprakeshdasji N.
Baldev Singh & Ors. etc. v. Manohar Singh & Anr.
Ganesh Trading Company v. Moji Ram
Messrs. Trojan & Co. Ltd. v. Rm N. N. Nagappa Chettiar
Ragu Thilak D. John v. S. Rayappan & Ors.
Rameshkumar Agarwal v. Rajmala Exports (P) Ltd.
Rani Kusum (SMT) v. Kanchan Devi (SMT) & Ors.
Salem Advocate Bar Association v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.