SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Sikk) 7

MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI
Suresh Khati – Appellant
Versus
Santosh Chetry – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Navtara Sarda, Advocate, Deven Rai, Advocate, Umesh Ranpal, Advocate

JUDGMENT

MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI,J. - The Learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, East Sikkim, at Gangtok (for short, "Claims Tribunal"), vide the impugned Judgment, dtd. 5/8/2020, computed the total compensation payable to the Claimant as Rs.24,11,279.00(Rupees twenty four lakhs, eleven thousand, two hundred and seventy nine) only and ordered that the Insurer, OP No.1, pay the compensation amount to the Claimant, with interest @ 9% per annum, from the date of filing of the Claim Petition till full and final payment. It was further ordered that, OP No.1 was at liberty to recover the same from the OPs No.2, 3 and 4 in accordance with law.

2. The Appellant being aggrieved by the Judgment and Award supra, in MACT Case No.60 of 2017 (Santosh Chetry alias Santosh Chettri vs. The Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd. and Others), dtd. 5/8/2020, is before this Court.

3. Before proceeding further with the matter, to bring clarity with regard to the parties, their order of appearance before the Claims Tribunal and before this Court are being delineated hereunder;

(i) Appellant, (owner of the vehicle) was OP No.2 before the Claims Tribunal.

(ii) Respondent No.1 (survivor of the acciden

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top