MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN
Ram Bahadur Subba @ Tawkey – Appellant
Versus
State of Sikkim – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Meenakshi Madan Rai, J. -The victim, a ten year old child was allegedly subjected to penetrative sexual assault four times by the Appellant, a fifty-three year old man, in March, 2020. Her mother at the relevant time was ailing and hospitalised and her father was tending to her. On 08-05-2020, PW-2 the father of the victim on coming to learn of the sexual assault from PW-6 the child's grandmother, lodged Exhibit 2 the FIR, stating the afore-mentioned facts and seeking early legal relief.
2. The investigation of the case was taken up by PW-16 the Investigating Officer, who submitted Charge-Sheet against the Appellant under Sections 376/354 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter, 'IPC'), read with Sections 6/8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter, 'POCSO Act'). The Learned Trial Court framed Charge against the Appellant under Section 5(l) of the POCSO Act for committing aggravated penetrative sexual assault repeatedly on the minor victim, under Section 5(m) of the POCSO Act, for committing aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a child below 12 years of age and under Section 5(n) for committing aggravated penetrative sexual assault o
The judgment reinforces that delays in reporting sexual offenses against minors do not invalidate the prosecution's case if corroborated by credible evidence.
The prosecution must provide substantial proof in sexual assault cases; the absence of medical evidence undermines the victim's testimony without corroboration.
The prosecution established the sexual assault case beyond reasonable doubt, affirming that minor discrepancies in witness testimonies do not negate the credibility of the case.
The court established that in cases of sexual assault, the victim's testimony can be sufficient for conviction, and that slight penetration constitutes an offense under the POCSO Act, regardless of t....
The court held that insufficient evidence for penetrative assault warrants acquittal under specific POCSO sections, yet convicted the appellant for lesser sexual assault under Section 9(n).
Minor discrepancies in victim testimony do not undermine the credibility of sexual assault claims under POCSO; conviction can still be upheld based on consistent evidence.
The credibility of minor victims in sexual assault cases does not solely rely on medical evidence; their coherent testimony can suffice for conviction, supported by corroborative witness accounts.
In sexual offenses against minors, the sole testimony of the victim is sufficient for conviction if deemed credible, even in the absence of corroborative evidence.
The court affirmed that the victim's consistent testimony suffices for conviction in sexual assault cases, reinforcing that age determination and credibility of the witness are pivotal in such judgme....
It is the duty of the court to examine the broader probabilities of a case and should not get swayed by minor contradictions or insignificant discrepancies in the statement of the prosecutrix, which ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.