THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK
BISWANATH SOMADDER
Bickey Pariyar alias Darjee, Son of Robin Pariyar – Appellant
Versus
State of Sikkim – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
BISWANATH SOMADDER, C.J.
1. The instant Criminal Appeal arose in respect of a judgment and order dated 29th November, 2023, rendered by the learned Special Judge (POCSO Act, 2012), Gangtok, Sikkim in S.T. (POCSO) Case No. 51 of 2021, whereby the appellant, Bickey Pariyar alias Darjee, was convicted of an offence committed under section 4(2) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, "the POCSO Act, 2012") and sentenced with simple imprisonment for a term of 20 years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees two thousand only), with a default stipulation.
2. A Division Bench of this Court heard the instant criminal appeal, being Crl. A. No. 03 of 2024. The Division Bench rendered two separate judgments on 05th March, 2025. One of the Hon’ble Judges (Meenakshi Madan Rai, J.) acquitted the convict (being the appellant herein) and the other Hon’ble Judge (Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J.) upheld the judgment and order of conviction rendered by the learned Special Judge (POCSO Act, 2012). This has resulted in a divergence of views and in such circumstances, the matter was referred before this Bench for a final decision on the issue.
3. Since the facts of the ca
Murugan vs State of Tamil Nadu
In sexual assault cases involving a minor, consent is legally void. Public documents such as birth certificates and school registers are admissible as primary evidence of age under statutory presumpt....
The court held that the prosecution failed to prove the victim's age beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing that consent from a minor is not legally valid under the POCSO Act.
Under protective sexual offence legislation, the consent of a minor is legally invalid. Age determination must prioritize official public documents, which are admissible without formal proof under th....
The court emphasized that mere admissibility of evidence does not establish its probative value, particularly when witness testimonies are inconsistent and influenced, raising reasonable doubt regard....
The court emphasized that the burden to prove the victim's age lies with the prosecution, which failed to establish it through credible evidence, leading to the acquittal of the appellant.
The prosecution must provide verifiable evidence to establish a victim's age when charging under the POCSO Act, as mere testimony is insufficient to prove minority.
Deceased minor victim's statements on sexual assault admissible under Evidence Act S.32 if causing death; school-first certificate proves age; no dual sentence under IPC S.376 and POCSO S.4 per S.42 ....
The court reaffirmed that the victim's testimony is decisive in sexual offence cases, and a minor's age must be established based on consistent evidence, including oral testimonies.
Point of law: Since the appellant/accused had made the victim pregnant by his act of penetrative sexual assault the offence under Section 5(j)(ii) of the POCSO Act is also attracted and conviction of....
Rape of minor girl - Conviction set aside - Subsequent refusal to marry cannot be come within the purview of cheating.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.