SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 486

S.N.SRIVASTAVA
DOODHNATH – Appellant
Versus
LAKHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.P.SINGH, Mahendra Prasad, P.K.DUBEY, Rajiv Kumar Srivastava, S.L.YADAV, U.N.Sharma

( 1 ) PRESENT second appeal has been preferred assailing the judgment and decree dated 15-4-1977 passed by Lower Appellate Court whereby Civil Appeal No. 92 of 1976 was allowed and judgment a decree dated 25-3-1976 passed by trial court was reversed.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFFS instituted suit No. 62 of 1971 with the impetratory relief of permanent injunction restraining defendants from interfering with their possession over the land marked by letters Cha, Chha, Ja and Jha in the plaint map and also for closing northern door enumerated therein attended with further relief to restrain them to have ingress and egress through Sahan shown by letters ba, Ya, Ra, and Sa on the ground that the land in suit was their own property which descended to them from their ancestors and further that the defendants had no right to interfere with the possession of plaintiffs. Defendants on the other hand repudiated plaint allegations in the written statement alleging that both the parties descend from common ancestors and that plaintiffs case as contained in the plaint is wholly wrong. It was further averred by the defendants that they were owners of part of the land as indicated in the written statement and la












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top