YATINDRA SINGH, SUNIL AMBWANI, D.P.SINGH
SURESH CHANDRA GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR, KANPUR NAGAR – Respondent
( 1 ) THE mam question involved in this writ petition is, whether the recovery under the UP Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972 (the 172 Act)can proceed after insertion of Section 32-G in the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 (the 1951 Act) and the enactment of the recovery of Debt Due to Bank and financial Institution Act, 1993 (the 1993 Act ). THE FACTS
( 2 ) M/s J S Patel Private Limited (the company) applied for grant of loan from the u P Financial Corporation (the Corporation)on 18-10-1996. The Corporation sanctioned a term loan of Rs 17 crores however, only a sum of Rs 1,42,48,000/- was disbursed to the company on instalments This loan was to be paid in five years The company premises was also mortgaged with the corporation and the entire machinery, goods (finished and unfinished) were hypothecated.
( 3 ) THE Company could not pay the loan the Corporation issued letter dated 23-11-2000 asking the Company to repay the dues failng which it threatened to take action under section 2 of the 1951 Act The Company filed original Suit No 638 of 2000 beiore the civil Judge (Senior Division), Allahabad for injunction against (he recovery along with applicati
Referred to : State of West Bengal v. Kesoram Industries Ltd.
Engineering Kamgar Union v. Electro Steels Castings Ltd
Pawan Kumar Jam v Pradeshiya Industrial and Investmeat Corpn of U.P Ltd
State Bank of India v M/s Indexport Reg istered
M. Karunanidhi v Union of India
Fateh Chand v State of Maharashtra
Bharat Hydro Power Corpn. v. State of Assam
Unique Butyle Tube Insdustries (P) Ltd v U.P. Financial Corpn
Government of AP v J.B.Educational Society
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.