SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 1538

N.K.MEHROTRA
DEVENDRA KUMAR MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
RAMENDRA kumar – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS is a revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and order dated 21. 7. 2005 passed by the Additional. District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 5 Lakhimpur kheri by which the learned Judge has granted permission to the opposite parties to file suit under Section 92 of the Code of civil Procedure.

( 2 ) THE opposite parties appeared by finding the caveat and I have heard the learned counsel for the revisionist and the opposite parties finally on merit.

( 3 ) THE opposite parties nos. 1 to 5 moved an application under Section 92 C. P. C. for permission to file a suit for removal of trustees from the Trust and for breach to the terms and conditions of the trust of the temple of Thakurji Maharaj in Mohalla dixitaana Goal Gokaran Nath which was admittedly constructed by Smt. Vidya Kunwari. It was alleged that a trust was created for public purposes and the opposite parties nos. 1 to 5 in this revision are Hindus and are followers of Sanatan Dharm. It was alleged that the applicants used to perform the religious rites i. e. Puja and Archana and the temple is a public temple. It was pleaded that Smt. Vidya Kunwari created a trust on 22. 7. 1947























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top