D.K.SETH
LILANAND THAKUR PAGAL BABA TRUST PRABANDH SAMITI – Appellant
Versus
THAKUR RADHA GOVINDJI MAHARAJ VRINDABAN AND OTHERS – Respondent
( 1 ) TWO suits were Instituted seeking the leave under Section 92 of C. P. C. In one of the suits, being Original Suit No. 2 of 1999, the learned District Judge, Mathura was one of the party, namely, defendant No. 9 filed in respect of the property of the Trust of Sri Lilanand Thakur pagal Baba Trust Vrindavan, with regard to the temple. in the other suit, being Original Suit No, 5 of 1999 relating to the Management of the property of the Hospital of Sri Lilanand Thakur pagal Baba, the District Judge was not made a defendant. In both the suits, applications for grant of leave have been filed before the learned District Judge who had granted the leave.
( 2 ) IT is contened that the District Judge has also granted injunction and the said order was challenged before this Court and the order of injunction was set aside by this Court in F. A. F. O. No. by an order dated. The petitioner as one of the defendent in suit has filed an application for transfer before this Court under Section 24 of the C. P. C. being transfer application No. which was disposed of on by this Court.
( 3 ) NOW Mr. R. N. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner in these revisions, has challenged
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.