SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(All) 754

D.K.SETH
LILANAND THAKUR PAGAL BABA TRUST PRABANDH SAMITI – Appellant
Versus
THAKUR RADHA GOVINDJI MAHARAJ VRINDABAN AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Janardan Sahai, R.N.SHARMA, V.K.BARMAN

D. K. SETH, J.


( 1 ) TWO suits were Instituted seeking the leave under Section 92 of C. P. C. In one of the suits, being Original Suit No. 2 of 1999, the learned District Judge, Mathura was one of the party, namely, defendant No. 9 filed in respect of the property of the Trust of Sri Lilanand Thakur pagal Baba Trust Vrindavan, with regard to the temple. in the other suit, being Original Suit No, 5 of 1999 relating to the Management of the property of the Hospital of Sri Lilanand Thakur pagal Baba, the District Judge was not made a defendant. In both the suits, applications for grant of leave have been filed before the learned District Judge who had granted the leave.

( 2 ) IT is contened that the District Judge has also granted injunction and the said order was challenged before this Court and the order of injunction was set aside by this Court in F. A. F. O. No. by an order dated. The petitioner as one of the defendent in suit has filed an application for transfer before this Court under Section 24 of the C. P. C. being transfer application No. which was disposed of on by this Court.

( 3 ) NOW Mr. R. N. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner in these revisions, has challenged










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top