SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(All) 2397

ARUN TANDON
VIJAY PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.D.RAJBHAR, MAHENDRA PRATAP SINGH, Piyush Shukla

ARUN TANDON, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri L. D. Rajbhar, learned counsel for the petitioners in all the writ petitions, Sri Mahendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the director, State Education, Research and Training Board, U. P. , lucknow and Sri Piyush Shukla, learned standing counsel for the state-respondents.

( 2 ) THESE six writ petitions have been filed by the persons, who claim themselves to be the members of the Denotified tribe (Vimukt Jati), namely, Bhar and Rajbhar, residents of District Azamgarh in the State of Uttar Pradesh. On the basis of their being members of the denotified tribes, the petitioners claim that they are entitled to be treated as members of Scheduled Castes/scheduled Tribes and are entitled to the benefits of reservation provided for in respect of the Scheduled castes/scheduled Tribes candidates. Accordingly the petitioners have prayed for quashing of the declaration under the Government order dated 20th February, 2004 (as contained in para 4 (a) of the guidelines issued for admission to the B. T. C. course qua the entrance examination of the year 2004, a copy whereof has been enclosed as annexure-3 to the first writ petition ). Under Clause 4 (a) (Condition


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top