SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 13

M.KATJU, YATINDRA SINGH
SUDHIR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.R.SINGH, S.C.Dubey, SUDHA DUBEY

M. KATJU, J.

( 1 ) BY means of this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 10. 3. 1999, Annexure-2 to the writ petition by which he has been removed from service.

( 2 ) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

( 3 ) IT appears that the petitioner was Branch Manager of the Muzaffarnagar District Cooperative bank Ltd. He was suspended by order dated 2. 7. 1997 vide Annexure-3 and he was given a charge-sheet dated 22. 8. 1997 vide Annexure-4 to the writ petition. In this charge-sheet, various allegations of financial irregularities, embezzlement and fraud have been made against the petitioner. The petitioner submitted a reply denying the charges vide Annexure-5 to the writ petition. It is alleged in paragraph 6 of the writ petition that no enquiry was held, instead the petitioner was issued a show cause notice dated 24. 7. 1998 to which he gave a reply dated 8. 8. 1998 vide Annexures-6 and 7 to the writ petition.

( 4 ) IN paragraph 10 of the writ petition, it is stated that the petitioner was not paid subsistence allowance although he sent several letters vide paragraph 11 to the writ petition. It is alleged in paragraph 12 of the writ petition that the den









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top