SUDHIR NARAIN, S.R.ALAM, BHANWAR SINGH
ASHA RAM VERMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS Full Bench has been constituted to answer the following question :
"in absence of applicability of Evidence Act to departmental enquiries, on what basis the concepts of "admissibility" or "relevancy" of evidence can be imported into departmental enquiry?"
( 2 ) THE question referred to above arises on the facts given below :
"the State of U. P. implemented the recommendations of the Vth Pay Commission Report from 1. 1. 1996. This report provided that the pay scale of the Government employee shall be fixed on new pay scales. The Government of Uttar Pradesh issued a Government Order dated 6. 9. 1997 addressing to the Commissioner/secretary, Board of Revenue, U. P. , Lucknow, wherein it was stated that the pay scale of Tehsildars/apar Tehslldars is being enhanced in the pay scale of Rs. 2,200-4,000 and in the like manner, the pay scales of Naib Tehsildars being Rs. 1,400-2,300 is being enhanced at Rs. 1,640-2,900. In view of the said Government Order, respondent No. 2 issued an order on 29. 10. 1997 directing all District Magistrates/commissioners of the State of U. P. to revise the pay scales of Tehsildars and Naib Tehsildars in accordance with the Governmen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.