( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner.

( 2 ) THIS writ petition has been filed against the impugned orders dated 16/05/1992 vide annexure-5, November 30, 1992 vide annexure- 7/10/1992 vide Annexure 15 and 10/07/1993 vide Annexure-18 to the writ petition.

( 3 ) WE have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and find no merit in this petition.

( 4 ) A perusal of the order dated 16/05/1992 (Annexure-5 to the writ petition) shows that the petitioner while functioning as Head Office inspector and Manager (Inspection) of the regional Office, Gonda was alleged to have committed various acts of misconduct for which a charge-sheet dated 24/10/1990 (Annexure-4a to the writ petition) was issued to him. Thereafter, an inquiry was held in which he was given an opportunity of hearing and the inquiry Officer gave his report dated 24/10/1991 (Annexure-4b to the writ petition ). A perusal of the inquiry report shows that the petitioner has been found guilty of various acts of misconduct on charge Nos. II, III, IV, VI and viii contained in the charge-sheet. Charge Nos. I and V have also been found to be partly proved. In writ jurisdiction we cannot sit as a Court