SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 12

SUNIL AMBWANI
DEBI SAHAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.D.Mandhyan

SUNIL AMBWANI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has challenged the order dated 24. 8. 1992 passed by Regional Employment officer. Meerut whereby his services have been terminated under U. P. Temporary Government servants (Termination of Service) Rules, 1975, after making him entitled to one months pay and the order dated 6. 6. 1992 by which an adverse entry was awarded to him in the year 1991-92.

( 2 ) I have heard counsel for the petitioner, and learned standing counsel.

( 3 ) THE facts giving rise to the present writ petition are that the petitioner belongs to Scheduled caste. He was appointed as a Peon after interview on temporary basis in the City Employment exchange, Ghaziabad. He was transferred to several places and that during relevant time, he was posted in the office of City Employment Exchange Officer. Hapur district Ghaziabad. A charge-sheet dated 5. 8. 1991 was given to him for unauthorised absence on several occasions for long periods, late arrival on duty, negligence of work on duty, failure to carry out the orders, doubtful integrity, directly sending the representation to higher officers and ministers, wrongful claim of House Rent Allowance, etc. The petitioner submitted hi










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top