SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 104

S.K.SINGH, M.KATJU
SHAHJAHAN KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.C.Deepak, RAKESH BAHADUR

M. KATJU, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition has been filed against the impugned order of the U. P. Public Service tribunal dated 31. 7. 2000 (Annexure-1 to the petition) and the order dated 8. 7. 1988 (Annexure-8 to the petition) and the order dated 30. 9. 1989 (Annexure-10 to the petition ).

( 2 ) THE petitioner was appointed as a Constable in Uttar Pradesh on 14. 2. 1977. It is alleged that his work and conduct was good and there was no adverse entry against him. On 21. 9. 1985, the petitioner was suspended and a chargesheet served on him on 21. 3. 1987 vide Annexure-2 to the petition. The petitioner sent a reply (copy of which is Annexure-3 to the petition ). Thereafter an enquiry was held and after show cause notice, he was dismissed on 1. 7. 1988 vide Annexure-8 to the petition. The petitioner filed an appeal, which was dismissed on 30. 8. 1989, vide annexure-10 to the petition. The petitioner then went to the Tribunal, which rejected his claim petition. Hence, this writ petition.

( 3 ) A large number of points have been raised in this petition but, in our opinion, the first argument itself is sufficient to allow this petition and hence, we are not going into the other arguments of

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top