( 1 ) BOTH these revisions have been directed against the common order passed in suits Nos. 44 of 1993 and 45 of 1993 by IIIrd Additional District Judge, Hamirpur on 27. 9. 1993. The facts of both the suits are connected and, therefore, the matter has been decided by the common judgment by the trial court. Both the revisions are accordingly disposed of by this common order.

( 2 ) I have heard Sri V. K. S. Chaudhary, learned senior advocate assisted by Sri A. K. Gupta. Learned counsel for the revisionists. Sri P. P. Srtvastava, learned senior advocate and Sri Anil srivastava were appearing on behalf of the opposite party and they took several adjournments for advancing their arguments. However, ultimately on 8. 7. 2002 they have withdrawn from the case and thereafter no body appeared for the opposite party. It appears that they were unable to support the order of the learned Additional District Judge and, therefore, had withdrawn from the matter and thereafter, no body has come forward to argue the matter on behalf of the State of U. P.

( 3 ) THE facts giving rise to these revisions in brief are as follows : "two Suits Nos. 44 of 1993 and 45 of 1993 were filed by the