SUNIL AMBWANI
TRILOK NATH MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE writ petitions filed by unsuccessful candidates of the Combined Lower Subordinate examination, 1998, held by U. P. Public Service Commission, Allahabad challenge office memorandum dated 15th November, 1999 issued by Secretary, Karmik Anubhag-4, Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, issuing direction to give up preparation of waiting list and reshuffling, in all the selections to be made by U. P. Public Service Commission, except where there is single post in the cadre.
( 2 ) I have heard Sri Ashok Khare, Senior Advocate, for petitioners Sri B. N. Singh, learned counsel appearing for U. P. Public Service Commission, as well as learned standing counsel for state Government.
( 3 ) BRIEF facts leading to filing of the writ petitions are, that an advertisement No. A-2/e-1/98-99 was issued on 6th September, 1998 for holding Combined Lower Subordinate State Services (Preliminary) Examination, 1998. The petitioners, who are eligible and qualified, applied and appeared in the examination. They were found successful in preliminary examination allowed to appear in the main examination and were declared to have qualified. Interviews were held between 1. 11. 1999 t
State of U.P. and Ors. v. Ravindra Nath Rai and Ors.
REFERRED TO : State of Haryana v. Subhash Chandra Marwaha
Neelima Shangla v. State of Haryana
REFERRED TO : Jai Narain Ram v. State of V.P. and Ors.
Shankarsan Dash v. Union of India
Jatendra Kumar v. State of Punjab
Prem Singh and Ors. v. Haryana State Electricity Board and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.