SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 124

D.S.SINHA, D.K.SHARMA
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
RAVINDRA NATH RAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashok Khare, Kripa Shanker Singh, Sabha Jeet Yadav

D. S. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri Sabha Jeet Yadav, learned counsel representing the appellants and Sri Ashok Khare, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, at length and in detail.

( 2 ) INSTANT Special Appeal, under Rule 5 of Chapter VIII of the Rules of Court, 1952, is directed against the Judgment and order dated 28th May, 1997, rendered by his Lordship Honble markande Katju. J, in Ravindra Nath Rai and others v. State of U. P, and others. Civil Misc. Writ petition No. 40495 of 1996, allowing the writ petition and giving to the appellants the following direction :

"the respondents are directed to prepare a waiting list in the said examination and consider and appoint the persons in the waiting list in accordance with merit to the extent of the number of candidates in the main select list who had not joined. "

( 3 ) THE acts and events constituting undisputed facts of the case, briefly stated, are as below :


"for the purposes of recruiting 525 Sub-Inspectors in Civil Police of the State, the Deputy inspector General of Police (Karmik), Police Headquarters. Allahabad, the appellant No. 5, issued an advertisement on 4th. October, 1991. Later on by means of another advertisement



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top