SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 1307

B.K.RATHI
SHOIB ULLAH – Appellant
Versus
BHARTESH CHANDRA JAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.S.DUBEY, SIDHESVAR PRASAD SINHA, SOMESHVARI PRASAD, Vishnu Gupta

B. K. RATHI, J.

( 1 ) THIS First appeal from order under Order 43, Rule 1 (u) of C. P. C. has been preferred against the order dated 16-7-2002 passed by VIIth Additional District Judge, Allahabad in Civil Appeal No. 27 of 2001. The facts necessary for the disposal of this Appeal are as follows.

( 2 ) THE respondent No. 1 filed the Suit No. 550 of 1998 in the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Allahabad for the following reliefs :- (1) Decree for accounting of the firm M/s. S. U. Builders. (2) Mandatory injunction to restrain the respondents 3 to 6 from taking any payment from respondent No. 1.

( 3 ) THE present appellants contested the Suit. One of the pleas taken by them is that firm M/s. S. U. Builders is an unregistered firm and therefore, the Suit is barred under Section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act" ). The Trial Court framed an issue on this plea and recorded finding on 19-2-2001 that the Suit is barred by Section 69 of the Act and therefore, dismissed the Suit. Aggrieved by that order the plaintiff-respondent No. 1 filed a Civil Appeal No. 27 of 2001 which has been allowed by the impugned order and wherein it has been held that the


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top