SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(All) 80

D.K.SETH
DEEPAK GANGULY – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.SHAHI, GANGULI, L.P.NAITHANI, R.N.Singh, S.N.Singh

D. K. SETH, J.

( 1 ) THE order dated 29. 1. 1986 (Annexure-7 to the writ petition) dismissing the petitioner form service and imposing a disqualification for future employment any where either in Government or autonomous body on undertaking inflicted by the Director, Wadia Institute of Himalayan geology is the subject matter of challenge in the present writ petition. Assailing the impugned order Mr. A. P. Shahi, learned Counsel for the petitioner raises three grounds: (i) inspection of documents demanded by the petitioner was not accorded to him, the petitioner was disallowed from examining the witnesses list of which was furnished, accepting 14 out of them and that before inflicting punishment, the copy of the enquiry report was not supplied, by reason whereof there has been violation of principles of natural justice vitiating the disciplinary proceedings and the punishment imposed (ii) assuming not admitting that the charges were proved and the petitioner was guilty, even that event, the punishment is too harsh and disproportionate considering the graveness of the charges alleged to have been proved, (iii) the initiation of the disciplinary proceeding having not been made in comp



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top