SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(All) 744

R.R.K.TRIVEDI
ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION NEW DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJAY YADAV, Anil Kumar Yadav, M.C.Dwivedi,

R. R. K. TRLVEDI, J.

In both the aforesaid writ petitions the controversy and the questions of fact and law involved are identical and thus both the writ peti tions may be decided by a common judg ment. Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged between the parties and learned counsel for parties have agreed that the petitions may be decided finally at this stage. Writ Petition No. 28320 of 1995 shall be the leading case.

2. Institution Maharshi Patanjali Vidya Mandir, Allahabad was established in 1988. It is recognized by and affiliated to Central Board of Secondary Education, Delhi. This institution imparted educa tion up to Class X. However, in 1994 it was permitted to start Class XI. The institu tion is run by a registered Society known as Maharshi Patanjali Vidya Mandir Samiti, Allahabad. It does not receive any grant or financial assistance from the Central or State Governments. The case of petitioner Arvind Kumar Sharma is that he was ad mitted in Class VI of this Institution in the year 1990 after successfully completing the Entrance Examination. Since then the petitioner continued to be a regular stu dent. In March, 1995, he appeared in the Examination conducted


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top