SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(All) 632

P.K.JAIN
DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, NORTHERN RAILWAY – Appellant
Versus
SECOND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.D.Mandhyan

P. K. JAIN, J.

( 1 ) HEARD counsel for the parties.

( 2 ) BY the present writ petition, the petitioner prays for quashing the order dated March 22, 1980 (Annexure-3 to the writ petition) whereby the review petition was allowed by Respondent No. 1.

( 3 ) RESPONDENT No. 2 moved an application under Section 15 of the Payment of Wages Act (hereinafter called as the Act) before the prescribed authority. The learned prescribed authority allowed the claim of Respondent No. 2 to the extent of Rs. 2108. 58 as wages and Rs. 250/- as compensation. Respondent No. 2 preferred Misc. Civil Appeal No. 802 of 1977 which was heard and dismissed by the First Addl. District Judge, Allahabad vide judgment and order dated february 2, 1978 and the order of the prescribed authority was affirmed, Thereafter, Respondent no. 2 moved an application under Order XLVII, Rule 1, C. P. C. for reviewing the order so far as it related to the award of compensation. The learned 2nd Addl. District Judge, Allahabad who heard the review application allowed the same vide judgment and order dated March 22, 1980 and enhanced the amount of compensation from Rs. 250/- to Rs. 1250/ -. The order passed on review application is

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top