SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(All) 1184

C.A.RAHIM
Z. U. AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.AVASHTHI, B.N.TIWARI, V.C.TIWARI


C. A. RAHIM, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the judgment and order of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ballia delivered on 1-12-1992. By the aforesaid judgment and order he allowed the said revision and set aside the order of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ballia dated 16-4-1992 and the case was remanded back with direction to proceed according to law. The learned Judge has also directed both the parties to appear before the said Court for taking part in further proceeding.

( 2 ) THE complainant filed a case in the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ballia against the revisionists for prosecuting them under Ss. 161, 167, 217, 218, 409, 467, 468 and 500, I. P. C. On 24-12-1991 the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ballia ordered to register the case and proceeded to examine the complainant and his witnesses under Ss. 200 and 202, Cr. P. C. After examining the two witnesses he transferred the case to the Court of the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ballia on 14-2-1992 for disposal. The learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate heard on the point of maintainability of the said complaint in view of S. 197, Cr. P. C. and after hearing he dismissed


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top