J.C.GUPTA, G.P.MATHUR, KUNDAN SINGH
GIRJESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a reference by the Additional Commissioner (Administration), Agra in his capacity as Chief Controlling Revenue Authority under Section 57 of the Indian Stamps Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act ).
( 2 ) THE relevant facts are that Smt. Chandra Prabha Sharma executed a sale deed of a house in favour of the applicants Girjesh Kumar Srivastava and his wife Smt. Surya Kumari on 1/01/1989 for a consideration of Rs. 1,05,000. 00. A stamp duty of Rs. 15,225. 00 was paid and the sale deed was registered in the office of Sub-Registrar Mathura, on 1/02/1989. The instrument (Sale deed) was inspected by the Assistant Inspector General of Registration in his capacity as Assistant Commissioner (Stamps) on 30/06/1992. He was of the opinion that the property had been under valued, and accordingly a reference was made to the District Registrar by the Sub-Registrar on 8/08/1992. The Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue) in his capacity as Collector, issued notice to the applicants (Girjesh Kumar Srivastava and Smt. Surya Kumari) on 26/05/1993 and directed the Tehsildar to submit a report on the valuation of the property. The applicants submitted a r
referred to : State of Himachal Pradesh v. A Parent of a Student of Medical College, Shimla
Himalaya House Company v. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority
Himalaya House Co. Ltd. v. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority
M/s. Goodyear India Ltd. v. State of Haryana
Controller of Estate Duty v. Kantilal
Canadian Eagle Oil Co. Ltd. v. R.
State of Tamil Nadu v. Chandra Shekharan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.