SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(All) 1334

O.P.GARG
MUNESHWAR DAYAL – Appellant
Versus
ZILA KARYAKRAM ADHIKARI, BIJNOR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.C.Singh

O. P. GARS, J.


( 1 ) BY means of this writ petition, the petitioner--Muneshwar Dayal has challenged the order dated 2. 1. 1996 passed by respondent No. 1--Zila Karyakram Adhikari, Bijnor on the basis of order dated 7. 12. 1995 passed by respondent No. 2--The Nideshak, Bal Vikas Seva Evam pustahar, U. P. . Lucknow and has prayed that the said order be quashed and the respondents be directed by means of a writ of mandamus not to interfere in the functioning of the petitioner on the post of peon.

( 2 ) COUNTER and rejoinder-affidavits have been exchanged. Heard Sri M. C. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned standing counsel.

( 3 ) IT is an admitted fact that the petitioner was appointed on the post of peon in class IV cadre in the Office of Bal Vikas Pariyojna Adhikari, Nazimabad, district Bijnor on 25. 9. 1993. He joined the post of peon on 1. 10. 1993. A Selection Committee was constituted under the rules for regularizatlon of the services of the petitioner. The petitioner was called for interview on 12. 10. 1994. The Selection Committee recommended the case of the petitioner for regularization of his services as peon and ultimately by order dated 25. 10. 199










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top