SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(All) 259

O.BHATT, MARKANDEY KATJU
ANAND AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
BALRAM DAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.SRIVASTAVA, ANUPAM KUMAR, P.Padia, R.G.PADIA, T.P.SINGH

ONKARESHWAR BHATT, J.

( 1 ) INSTANT First Appeal From Order has been filed under Section 37 (1) (a) of Arbitration and conciliation Act. 1996. [hereinafter referred to as the 1996 Act ). It is directed against judgment and order dated 19. 2. 2001 passed in Arbitration Case No. 3 of 2001 filed under Section 9 of the 1996 Act. By the impugned order, the District Judge, Varanasi has allowed the application and has restrained the appellants from carrying on business of dissolved firm in the name and style m/s. Kanhaiya Swaran Kala Kendra with its assets and using goodwill. By the impugned order, the Arbitrator appointed by the parties was also appointed Receiver to prepare inventory of the assets and stocks of the aforesaid firm. The Receiver was also directed to take the account books of the firm in his custody and to transact further business of the firm only if it is necessary for the winding up of the affairs of the firm. It was also ordered that Arbitrator will decide the dispute regarding damages, etc. which have been claimed when he decides the disputes and gives his award.

( 2 ) SRI T. P. Singh, learned counsel of the appellants and Dr. R. G. Padia, learned counsel for the resp




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top