SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(All) 818

KAMAL KISHORE
RASHEED AHMED – Appellant
Versus
KARIMA KHATOON – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.A.Khan, S.Mirza, Z.Silani

KAMAL KISHORE, J.


( 1 ) THIS is the second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 31/05/1982 passed by the then learned V Additional District Judge,hardoi dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment and decree passed by Munsif East, Hardoi in Regular suit No. 113 of 1978.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to this appeal are that the original plaintiff-appellant had filed the suit for partition on the allegations that one Sheikh Angne had two wives and that Maula Bux plaintiff-appellant and Ilahi Bux defendant-respondent are the sons of Sheikh Angne from the second wife. It is alleged that by means of oral gift Sheikh Angne had in his life time partitioned his whole property amongst his sons on 18-9-1932 and in accordance with each had come in the possession of the property so given and mutations in papers were also made. The plaintiff appellant has in para 3 of the plaint mentioned the properties which were given to him (Mula Bux) and to the defendant Ilahi Bux. It shows that Gondhar and Nalewala groves were given to the plaintiff and the defendant half and half and that in bangkala the plaintiff and the defendant had 1/4 share each and that Jogin Bali grove was given to the p





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top