SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(All) 885

D.R.CHAUDHARY, B.K.ROY
ATIQUE AHMED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DAYA SHANKAR MISHRA, S.M.A.QAZMI, S.S.RAY

( 1 ) ALL these three writ petitions which are being heard together have been placed today for further hearing.

( 2 ) IN Crl. Misc. Writ Petition No. 1911 of 2001 the prayer of the petitioner Atique Ahmad, who happens to be a Member of Legislative Assembly for the last 12 years continuously and claims to be popular equally between Hindus and Muslims belonging to Apna Dal, has come up with following prayers :-" (I) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties directing them to apprise the petitioner and to submit all the pending cases against the petitioner till date along with actual status report so that the petitioner may not be victim of the fabrication of the false cases in future. (ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties directing the Principal Home Secretary/home Secretary Government of Uttar Pradesh and the Director General of Police, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow to issue official order directing all the officers referred in paragraph 56 who are opposite parties in Criminal Misc. Application No. Nil of 1999, under Section 156 (3) Code of Criminal Procedure moved before the Ch




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top