SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(All) 818

G.P.MATHUR, S.P.SRIVASTAVA
DIRECTOR, INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, KANPUR – Appellant
Versus
HIYAT KHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Dinesh Kackker, Dinesh Pathak, S.N.Verma

G. P. MATHUR, J.

( 1 ) THIS special appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 23. 8. 1999 of a learned single Judge by which Writ Petition No. 39548 of 1998 filed by respondent. Hiyat Khan, was allowed and the order dated 12. 10. 1998 passed by Director. Indian Institute of Technology. Kanpur (hereinafter referred to as the IIT) terminating his training was quashed.

( 2 ) THE respondent, Hiyat Khan, was enrolled by the IIT, Kanpur, as a trainee (Machinist) on 7. 10. 1996 for a period of two years. His training was initially terminated by order dated 19. 9. 1997. This was challenged by him by filing C. M. Writ Petition No. 39148 of 1997 which was allowed on 21. 5. 1998 and the order terminating his training was quashed. It was, however, left open to the appellants (respondents in the writ petition) to take appropriate action and pass a fresh order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the writ petitioner. Thereafter, the appellant served a notice dated 12. 6. 1998 upon the respondent to show cause why his training programme be not terminated. He was also afforded an opportunity of personal hearing. Thereafter, an order was passed on 12. 10. 1998 terminating his














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top