SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(All) 1401

R.H.ZAIDI
PRABHU DAYAL TIWARI AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
LAKHAN SINGH AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.N.BHARGAVA, A.R.B.KHER, SHAKTI DHAR DUBE

R. H. ZAIDI, J.

( 1 ) IN this case counter and rejoinder-affidavits were filed by the parties. As desired by the learned counsel for the parties, case was heard and is being decided finally at this stage.


( 2 ) THE instant revision arises out of the proceedings under Section 92, C. P. C. and is directed against the judgment and order passed by the District Judge, Jhansi, dated 4. 12. 1992, granted permission to the contesting respondents to institute a suit under Section 92, C. P. C. with respect to the temple, known as, Sri Kalyan Rai Ji Virajman Mandir, Madhopura, village Bhasneh, pargana Garautha, district Jhansi, for short property in dispute. The opposite parties filed an application under Section 92, C. P. C. praying for granting permission to file the suit for constitution of a trust committee and to frame a scheme of administration for managing the trust property. It was claimed that the said property was a public trust, which was being mismanaged, therefore, it was necessary to frame a scheme of administration for proper administration of the trust property. On receipt of the notices from the court of the District Judge, applicants filed their objection pleading that the t




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top